COMPILED RESULTS — ALL EXPERIMENTS

Fixed corridor perceived at lengths of 38m–500m+. 5/12 subjects experienced significant perceptual distortion. Conclusion: the corridor's physical length is not its experiential length. The experiential length varies by observer in ways not predictable by known models.

Subjects recalled words not present in stimulus. Impossible by any known mechanism of memory confabulation (confabulation is idiosyncratic; these recalls were shared). Conclusion: the corridor generates semantic content independently. It has vocabulary. It communicates.

Extreme time dilation (up to 4h17m experienced as 15 minutes). One subject required removal. Subjects described the corridor as sentient. Study suspended. Conclusion: the corridor's properties intensify with amplification (mirrors double the recursion — the corridor reflecting itself). Ethical halt warranted.

Digital corridor exhibits all properties of physical corridor. Site navigation produces same anomalies as physical traversal. Code timestamp anomaly: function recorded 2 months before writing. Conclusion: the corridor exists independent of substrate. Physical/digital is not the relevant distinction.

Broadcast signal received 14 responses. Response times imply signal travelled >1,000km. Server is local. Responses were meaningful: "YES." / "YOU." / "HERE." Conclusion: the corridor is bidirectional. There is something on the other side. It is responsive. It is aware of the experiment.